Real photos
Your work, your products, your premises. They earn the most trust in advance because nobody else has them.
Imagery, photos, graphics and icons for your website: selection, licences, image formats and accessibility. Images that build trust.
Imagery is the sum of the decisions about how a business presents itself in pictures: choice of subject, perspective, light, colour mood, editing, and the balance between photos and graphics. It is part of the brand, just like the logo, colours and typeface. You can find more on the brand as a whole under colour palette and typography.
The practical tasks include photography, selecting licensed images, illustrations, icons, and preparing everything for screen and print. Good images do a job: they show results, explain processes, make products tangible or create atmosphere. Images with no job are decoration, and they cost loading time.
On the technical side come file format, size, compression and alt text. An image that loads 4 megabytes on a phone does more harm than good. And an image without alt text stays silent for people with visual impairments and for search engines.
Images work faster than text. Within seconds, a visitor decides whether a page looks credible, solid or generic. Photos that people have already seen on ten other websites signal arbitrariness.
Myth: “As long as the images are big and high-resolution, they're fine.” Fact: size is not a mark of quality. What counts is the message, sharpness, light and fit with the brand. A small, honest picture of real work is worth more than a huge symbolic photo of a handshake.
Example (fictional): a floor fitter shows a stock photo of smiling people in a bright living room on his page. A series would work better: the room before, the laying, the finished floor in raking light. Each image answers one of the customer's questions: what does your work look like, how does it go, what do I get?
Your work, your products, your premises. They earn the most trust in advance because nobody else has them.
From image libraries, with a clear licence. Good for abstract content or illustration, provided the choice is deliberate and distinctive.
They explain processes, relationships and data. They work particularly well when designed in a consistent style.
Small signs that help people find their way. A consistent stroke weight and size matter more than artistic ambition.
Short videos and animations. Use them sparingly, with subtitles, and never starting automatically.
A consistent treatment of colour and contrast, so that images from different sources fit together.
An image concept defines how your business presents itself in pictures before anyone picks up a camera or pulls a photo from a library. It is a short document, not a manual, and it saves many discussions later on.
An image concept has a second benefit: it keeps images consistent over time, even when different people choose them. That is part of what makes a brand, see also brand strategy.
Images are not decoration but answers to questions that visitors have. Once you know the questions for each page, the shot list almost writes itself.
| Visitor's question | Suitable subject | Example (fictional businesses) |
|---|---|---|
| What does your work look like? | Results, close-ups, before and after | Joinery: a finished kitchen run in daylight, a detail of a drawer joint |
| How does working together go? | Work steps, tools, rooms | Tax office: a meeting table with open documents, hands on a calculator |
| Where is the business? | Entrance, façade, surroundings, car park | Practice: entrance with sign, the route from the car park |
| Who will I be working with? | Hands at work, work clothing, equipment | Trades: hands with tools, a vehicle with signwriting |
| What exactly do I get? | Product, packaging, scale, use | Workshop-made goods: the product on a neutral background, and next to it in use |
| Is this right for me? | Mood, situations of use | Café: guests in conversation, a seating corner, the afternoon light |
| Is it safe and clean? | Tidiness, materials, equipment | Workshop: a tidy hall, testing equipment |
Next to each subject, note which page it is for and in which aspect ratio (wide, tall, square). That saves cropping later that cuts off heads or details.
Real photos are the most valuable thing a business website can have, because nobody else has them. Whether you take them yourself or commission them depends on your standards and the subject.
Stock photos have their place, for abstract topics, backgrounds, or when shooting is not possible. The problem is that they are interchangeable: whatever ranks first in the library, visitors see on many sites. If you use them, it is best to choose against the grain.
| Licence type | Meaning | What to watch for |
|---|---|---|
| Royalty-free | Pay once, then use several times within the terms | “Royalty-free” does not mean “free of charge” or “unlimited”. Read the terms: media, print run, duration |
| Rights-managed | Use agreed by occasion, time, place and scope | More expensive, but more exclusive. Pay attention to the exact contract terms |
| Creative Commons | Free to use under certain conditions, such as attribution | Depending on the variant: attribution, no editing, no commercial use. Read the licence text carefully |
| Public domain | No rights protected any longer, or rights waived | Check the source; trade mark rights and the rights of people shown remain unaffected |
| AI-generated images | The tool's terms of use decide; the legal position is evolving | Read the terms, do not fake authenticity, and check for likenesses of people and trade marks |
Document the following for every image: source, licence, date of acquisition, proof. A simple spreadsheet is enough. Anyone who later has to prove that they were allowed to use an image will be glad of it.
The same applies here: this is not legal advice. In disputes or unclear situations, ask a specialist lawyer in copyright and media law.
| Topic | Principle | In practice |
|---|---|---|
| Copyright | The photo belongs to the person who took it, even if you paid for it | Agree usage rights in writing: scope, duration, channels, editing, passing on |
| Image from the internet | An image being visible online does not make it free | Use only with permission or a suitable licence |
| People in the picture | Consent is regularly required for photos of identifiable people | Obtain it in writing, state the purpose, point out the right to withdraw |
| Employees | Consent is voluntary and can be withdrawn | Plan for departures and withdrawals in how you maintain images |
| Children | Particular care, consent of the parents or guardians | Avoid if possible, or do not show faces recognisably |
| Brands and works in the picture | Logos, artworks and buildings can touch on rights | Watch the background; if in doubt, get permission |
| Image credit | Some licences require attribution | Credits page or caption, as the licence text demands |
Deleting and replacing: if a person or rights holder asks you to remove an image, respond promptly. A list showing which image is on which page makes this easy.
| Medium | Strength | Weakness | When to use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Photo | Authenticity, emotion, proof | Not suited to abstract subjects; takes effort | Work, results, rooms, people |
| Illustration | Explains processes, has its own character | Needs its own style; upkeep effort | Complex topics, processes, brand world |
| Icon | Orientation in a small space | Ambiguous without text | Menus, lists, controls, always with a label |
| Chart | Makes numbers and relationships clear | Only as good as the data | Comparisons, developments, processes |
| Video/animation | Shows movement and processes | Data volume, effort, barriers | Processes that text does not explain, started by a click |
Colours, typography and imagery belong together: colour palette and typography set the frame within which graphics are created.
| Format | Suitability | Advantages | Limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPEG | Photos | Widely supported, good compression for photos | Lossy, no transparency |
| PNG | Graphics with transparency, screenshots | Lossless, transparency | Large files for photos |
| WebP | Photos and graphics | Smaller than JPEG and PNG at the same quality, transparency possible | Fallback needed for very old browsers |
| AVIF | Photos | Very small files at good quality | More complex to produce, check support |
| SVG | Logos, icons, simple graphics | Infinitely scalable, tiny, adjustable via code | Not for photos |
| Documents, print-ready files | Layout is preserved | Awkward on a phone, not for main content |
How these steps affect loading time is shown under loading time. A step-by-step guide is provided by the article Optimising images for your website.
Images from different sources should look as if they came from one mould. You achieve this not through filters but through a few fixed decisions.
A small test: lay ten images from your site side by side, reduced to the size of a postage stamp. Do they look like a family or like a jumble?
Images must be usable by everyone, including people who cannot see them. This concerns alt text, but also text in images, contrast and movement.
More on the requirements on the page accessibility.
A small joinery (made up) has a page with stock photos of wooden planks, a hammer on a white background and smiling people in suits. Customers say on the phone: “On the website it looks like everyone else's.”
The result cannot be promised in numbers, but it can be observed: the questions on the phone change (“I've seen your work”), and the site looks unmistakable. That is exactly the purpose of imagery.
| Myth | Fact |
|---|---|
| The more images, the better | Every image costs loading time and attention. A few good images with a purpose beat many arbitrary ones |
| You can use images from a Google search | Image search also shows protected images. Using them without permission can be expensive |
| A higher resolution is always better | Files that are too large slow the page down. The right size is what counts |
| A smartphone is not enough for good photos | For many subjects it is enough, if the light, framing and background are right |
| Filters make images look professional | Consistent, restrained editing looks professional; conspicuous filters rarely do |
| Alt text is only for search engines | It is first of all for people with visual impairments and for anyone whose images do not load |
If you find more than two weaknesses, a targeted overhaul is worthwhile before a new design. The page layout is described in structure of a company website, and the texts for it in website copy.
Not every photo needs a studio. For products, details and rooms, simple means are enough to build a clean, recognisable series of images. What matters is a fixed set-up that can be repeated.
Location and light. A table near a large window, ideally with north light or an overcast sky, gives soft light. Direct sun creates harsh shadows. A white sheet of paper or a polystyrene board on the opposite side brightens the shadows.
Background. A plain card, a large tile or a calm piece of fabric. Use the same material for a series.
Camera and tripod. A smartphone on a tripod or a firm support avoids camera shake and keeps distances the same. Wipe the lens beforehand.
Perspective. Always work from the same angle: head-on, slightly from above or at an angle. Repeatability makes series look calm.
Framing. The product fills the picture, with a little air at the edge so that crops for other formats also work.
Details and scale. A shot with a hand, a tape measure or a familiar object shows the size. Close-ups of material, workmanship and special features build trust.
Editing. Match brightness and white balance, sharpen lightly, crop to fixed dimensions. Nothing more.
Rooms are best photographed in daylight, tidied, and with the lights on that suit the daylight. Straight lines, a shot from hip to eye height, and keeping the window out of the picture or including it deliberately. Several perspectives per room give a better impression than one wide-angle photo.
Over time many images accumulate. Without order, nobody knows which version is the current one, where it came from and whether it may be used. A simple image archive solves this.
| Component | Implementation | Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Folder structure | By topic or service, with “Original”, “Web” and “Print” beneath | Quick finding, no mix-ups between versions |
| File names | Descriptive, without umlauts, with a date or version if needed | Less searching, better findability on the web |
| Rights list | Spreadsheet with image, source, licence, photographer, consents, expiry date | Proof when questions arise, deadline for deletion |
| Alt text list | Spreadsheet with image and description | Reuse, consistency |
| Usage list | Which image is on which page? | Quick replacement when something changes |
| Backup | Originals additionally stored in another location | Protection against loss |
The archive does not have to live in specialist software. A well-named folder in your file storage plus a spreadsheet is enough for most businesses. What matters is that one person is responsible and that the archive is updated with every new image file. For design and brand, see brand strategy.
Which subjects, which mood, which framing and which colour effect suit your brand?
We draw up a list of the subjects needed and advise on photographers, shoots and selection.
Consistent symbols, charts and illustrations that explain content rather than decorate it.
Suitable sizes, modern formats and alt text, so that images load quickly and are accessible.
Usage rights, licence sources and rights of people shown are documented before an image goes online.
The main cost is sourcing. Your own photos require a photographer's fee, preparation and time; licensed images cost fees per image or by subscription. Preparing images for the web, by contrast, is relatively inexpensive and pays off in loading time and findability.
The calculation behind it: How we calculate.
No, they can fill gaps, for example with abstract topics. Choose deliberately, avoid the commonest subjects, and label licences properly.
For the most important subjects (your work, your product, your premises) it is almost always worth it. We give you a shot list and tips for preparation.
Only with express permission or under a licence that allows the use. An image that can be found on the internet is therefore not free.
A short description of an image's content for screen readers and search engines. It describes what can be seen and why it is relevant. A guide is in the article Alt text for images.
As large as necessary, as small as possible: matched to the display size and in a modern, compressed format. Details are in the article Optimising images.
Legally and in terms of design, this is a shifting field. Check the licence terms of the tool, label images where necessary, and do not use them for things that promise authenticity, such as references or customer testimonials.
As many as are needed to answer questions. A service page often manages with three to five well-chosen ones. Better a few that show something than many that merely fill space.
Only with the customer's consent, and with regard to the rights of third parties, such as in buildings or people in the picture. Clarify this in writing before publication.
Show the result without recognisable people and without details that point to the customer, for example just the room, the product or the façade, once the customer agrees. Describe the starting situation and the approach in the text, so that the image does not have to carry everything alone.
That depends on the layout. As a guide, two to three times the display width is usually enough (for high-resolution screens), and no more. It is worth providing several sizes and letting the browser choose. Files in a modern format stay much smaller than classic JPEG files.
That depends on the licence. Some licences require attribution, others do not. In any case, note internally where an image comes from, and check the licence text before you decide.
Send us your website address and your most important question about imagery. You will receive a personal assessment.